Skeptomania - Paranormal / UFOs, etc.

A forum to discuss the paranormal.

Skeptomania - Paranormal / UFOs, etc. Forum Index -> CRIME, LAW, & THE COURTS -> Mexican Official Nabbing White House BlackBerries Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic  Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic 
Mexican Official Nabbing White House BlackBerries
PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:12 am Reply with quote
enigma
Deputy Dawg
 
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 2380
Karma: +36
Location: Somewhere in Tennessee




Secret Service Catch Mexican Official Nabbing White House BlackBerries


Whether he was up to no good or simply desperate to play BrickBreaker, a Mexican press attache was caught on camera by Secret Service pocketing several White House BlackBerries during a recent meeting in New Orleans, FOX News has learned.

Sources with knowledge of the incident said the official, whose first name is Rafael, took six or seven of the handheld devices from a table outside a special room in the hotel where the Mexican delegation was meeting with President Bush.

Everyone entering the room was required to leave their cell phones, BlackBerries and other such devices on the table, a commonplace practice when high-level meetings are held. American officials discovered their missing belongings when they were leaving the session.

It didn't take long before Secret Service officials reviewed videotape taken by a surveillance camera and found footage showing "Rafael" absconding with the BlackBerries.

Sources said "Rafael" made it all the way to the airport, where the Mexican president was preparing to leave New Orleans, before Secret Service officers caught up with him. He was forced to return the BlackBerries.

Sources said the man claimed to have taken the devices accidentally. The sources said they believe no further actions were taken against him by American authorities, though it is unclear what disciplinary measures, if any, await him in Mexico.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352378,00.html

_________________
Sworn to Serve and Protect your ass... Not to kiss your ass.
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:35 pm Reply with quote
asmodee
 
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 858
Karma: +16




Well, isn't that just about enough to piss you off? If I did that I'd be charged with theft, espionage and treason, but then I'm only a tax paying citizen of this country. The fact that a foreigner, for any reason, can simply walk away after that is infuriating, diplomatic immunity or no. At the very least he should have had a couple hour long session with Bertha, the cavity search wench.

_________________
Yes, I LOVE to talk while I fight! What shall we talk about? Wounds? Scars? Hot, dirty monkey love?
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:17 pm Reply with quote
Raven
Google Meister
 
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 2742
Karma: -18
Location: Detroit, MI, USA, North America, Earth, Sol, Orian's Arm, Milkyway, Uni Alpha-Prime




What ever happened to the good old days of killing government spies... Oh'no, killing spies isn't nice anymore, can't do that. Instead we can just slap him on the hand and say "no, bad, no touch".

_________________
"The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion that stands at the cradle of true art and true science. Whoever does not know it and can no longer wonder, no longer marvel, is as good as dead, and his eyes are dimmed."
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:13 pm Reply with quote
asmodee
 
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 858
Karma: +16




That's pretty much it, unless he's a lowly soldier for a country we are at war with. Then we can nail him to a chair and peal his skin off to make him talk, or at least find out that, being a lowly soldier, he doesn't know anything. Same old crap as always. The more power you have, the fewer rules apply to you.

_________________
Yes, I LOVE to talk while I fight! What shall we talk about? Wounds? Scars? Hot, dirty monkey love?
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:05 pm Reply with quote
Yaish
Intel Chief
 
Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 6218
Karma: +31




asmodee wrote:
That's pretty much it, unless he's a lowly soldier for a country we are at war with. Then we can nail him to a chair and peal his skin off to make him talk, or at least find out that, being a lowly soldier, he doesn't know anything. Same old crap as always. The more power you have, the fewer rules apply to you.


Yeah, we do that. Come one Asmodee, you know better than to try that shit here.

How about this? Where was the fucking Secret Service Agent keeping an eye on the blackberries while they were left on the table? Shit, I don't leave my phone unattended in my own office and I don't have any national secrets on there.

_________________
... the kilt had concealed a blaster strapped to one thigh and a knife to the other. He was aware of the present gentle customs against personal weapons, but he felt naked without them. Such customs were nonsense anyhow, foolishment from old women - there was no such thing as "dangerous weapons," only dangerous people.
--Robert Heinlein in Methuselah's Children
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:38 am Reply with quote
asmodee
 
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 858
Karma: +16




Okay, we don't literally nail them to a chair and peal their skin off, but we do routinely torture people for information in Iraq, or at least we did before it hit the fan. I have a nephew in the Air Force. He's a hell of a guy. Never hurt anyone in his life. It was a shock to hear him explain to me the last time he was back how it was necessary to get the information we needed to keep our troops safe. Now, to be fair, he didn't admit to me any torture he witnessed or knew about and he did not act as if he had seen or heard about it firsthand, but he was definitely brainwashed enough with the old '80s "the enemy is the devil" mentality we had with Russia to try to convince me that, in certain instances, this type of treatment of prisoners was justifiable. It makes me wonder exactly what the value of a signature of a US official on any document is these days. We've never been real good at honoring our agreements, in this case, the Geneva Convention.

Yeah, the bad guys are really bad. They're so bad because they're nuts. That does not justify torturing them.

_________________
Yes, I LOVE to talk while I fight! What shall we talk about? Wounds? Scars? Hot, dirty monkey love?
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:58 am Reply with quote
Yaish
Intel Chief
 
Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 6218
Karma: +31




asmodee wrote:
Okay, we don't literally nail them to a chair and peal their skin off, but we do routinely torture people for information in Iraq, or at least we did before it hit the fan. I have a nephew in the Air Force. He's a hell of a guy. Never hurt anyone in his life. It was a shock to hear him explain to me the last time he was back how it was necessary to get the information we needed to keep our troops safe. Now, to be fair, he didn't admit to me any torture he witnessed or knew about and he did not act as if he had seen or heard about it firsthand, but he was definitely brainwashed enough with the old '80s "the enemy is the devil" mentality we had with Russia to try to convince me that, in certain instances, this type of treatment of prisoners was justifiable. It makes me wonder exactly what the value of a signature of a US official on any document is these days. We've never been real good at honoring our agreements, in this case, the Geneva Convention.

Yeah, the bad guys are really bad. They're so bad because they're nuts. That does not justify torturing them.



And just where does that information come from? We have not engaged in torture. Torture is pulling out a guys fingernails with pliers. Torture is stabbing someone with a redhot screwdriver, so it cauterizes itself and they don't bleed out before you are done with them. Torture is beating people with rubber hose, or electrocuting them with cattle prods.

Sleep deprivation is not torture. Isolation is not torture. Even waterboarding is not torture, despite the fact that John McCain doesn't like it. Please bring me proof of a single instance of officially sanctioned torture committed by U.S. Troops in Iraq.


As for the bad guy? He's trying to kill your nephew. Yeah, the one that's a "hell of a guy". Do you want him back safe and sound?
Maybe I'm a bit primitive, but when you try to hurt or kill one of MY tribe, I'm just hunky dory with torture.

_________________
... the kilt had concealed a blaster strapped to one thigh and a knife to the other. He was aware of the present gentle customs against personal weapons, but he felt naked without them. Such customs were nonsense anyhow, foolishment from old women - there was no such thing as "dangerous weapons," only dangerous people.
--Robert Heinlein in Methuselah's Children
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:04 am Reply with quote
asmodee
 
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 858
Karma: +16




That's where we will have to disagree. My nephew is trying to kill him, too. That makes them equals on opposite sides. To him, we're the devils. And while you may not consider sleep deprivation to be torture many people who've confessed to crimes in this country have successfully argued that the police deprived them of sleep to elicit a false confession, and that's in time frames closer to a day and a half or two days. I've read reports of prisoners being deprived of sleep for three weeks. While it may not cause physical pain or scarring, it is very much torture.

The United Nations Convention Against Torture defines torture as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions." Torture does not necessarily mean pain.

I can certainly see where you are coming from on this, but I have empathy for the other side, too. Yes, by our standards, these are vile people and it is easy to think of them as subhuman, but they are very much human. The problem with the word "justified" is that there is never a clearly defined line on what is "justified" and what is not. Each time we deem something to be "justified" we get a little more desensitized to that type of thing. It's easier the next time to go just one tiny step further. I would like to think of us as being a little more human than that. Don't put them up in the Ritz or anything and, by all means, execute them if they are found guilty of war crimes, but don't commit war crimes in the process.

_________________
Yes, I LOVE to talk while I fight! What shall we talk about? Wounds? Scars? Hot, dirty monkey love?
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:36 am Reply with quote
enigma
Deputy Dawg
 
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 2380
Karma: +36
Location: Somewhere in Tennessee




OK... I'm gonna say this one time, then I'm out because I could get real ugly real fast on this.

We have not tortured anyone... bring me proof that someone is being or has been torture. Just because you don't like or couldn't do it doesn't mean it's torture.

Sleep deprivation is NOT torture... it is sleep deprivation, period. We haven't pulled out fingernails, broken bones, nothing of the sort. Water-boarding... while unpleasant is not torture. So far the worst I've seen is some photos of the enemy in embarrassing positions and poses.

This isn't the crowd to bring any anti-American, anti-troops BS to...

_________________
Sworn to Serve and Protect your ass... Not to kiss your ass.
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 12:43 pm Reply with quote
Raven
Google Meister
 
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 2742
Karma: -18
Location: Detroit, MI, USA, North America, Earth, Sol, Orian's Arm, Milkyway, Uni Alpha-Prime




i didn't see it as anti-either...

_________________
"The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion that stands at the cradle of true art and true science. Whoever does not know it and can no longer wonder, no longer marvel, is as good as dead, and his eyes are dimmed."
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:00 pm Reply with quote
asmodee
 
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 858
Karma: +16




Loving your country and supporting your troops does not mean you have to give up all rights to not like what your country or your troops are doing. I am not anti-American. Quite the opposite. It infuriates me that politicians routinely wipe their asses with the Constitution, current president especially.

I'm not sure exactly where the anti-American/anti-troops sentiment comes into play in anything I've posted. So many people want their cake and want to eat it too. Is this a free country, or do we give up the right to bitch if we choose not to vote? It's one or the other, not both. If you don't like what I have to say, welcome to America! The system works! The very nature of freedom is that you won't always like what I have to say, but I am free to say it anyway. One of my pet peeves is the saying, "You don't have the right to bitch if you didn't vote." My rights were paid for in blood, not ballot boxes. To claim otherwise is to cheapen the blood which paid for our freedoms. I have the deepest respect for our troops and the deepest love for my country. That doesn't mean I have to like the government or any given politician, nor does it mean I have to automatically agree with everything our troops do. Just because I see the enemy as a human being and not a thing to be slaughtered does not give me any less respect for my own country, just more respect for a human life. Quite frankly I am surprised to see the general sentiment here that the "enemy" is one amoral, evil entity and not a bunch of individual human beings who mostly think they are doing the right thing.

You ask for proof that people are being tortured? The ACLU has enough proof to start a lawsuit about it. How about the leaked DOJ memo that, while doesn't actually say "people are bing tortured", sure as hell says, "it's okay for the President to order people tortured". You are a logical bunch and none of you are stupid. You don't say, "it's okay to ..." unless you intend to "...", do you? Hell, autopsy reports PROVING that prisoners were tortured to death were released clear back in October...of 2005. I leave you with a few gems from some of those autopsies:

Quote:
Multiple blunt force injuries. Abrasion in upper right forehead. Abrasion on right lower forehead above eyebrow. Multiple contusions on right cheek and lower nose, left upper forehead, back of head. Abrasions on chest, lower costal margin. Contusions on arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, upper inner arm, groin, inner thigh, right back of knee and calf, left calf, left lower leg. Cause of death was pulmonary embolism due to blunt force injuries.

Quote:
Detainee was found unresponsive restrained in his cell. Death was due to blunt force injuries to lower extremities complicating coronary artery disease.Contusions and abrasions on forehead, nose, head, behind ear, neck, abdomen, buttock, elbow, thigh, knee, foot, toe, hemorrhage on rib area and leg. Detainee died of blunt force injuries to lower extremities, complicating underlying coronary artery disease. The blunt force injuries to the legs resulted in extensive muscle damage, muscle necrosis and rhabomyolysis. Electrolyte disturbances primarily hyperkalemia (elevated blood potassium level) and metabolic acidosis can occur within hours of muscle damage. Massive sodium and water shifts occur, resulting in hypovolemic shock and casodilatation and later, acute renal failure. The decedent's underlying coronary artery disease would compromise his ability to tolerate the electrolyte and fluid abnormalities, and his underlying malnutrition and likely dehydration would further exacerbate the effects of the muscle damage. The manner of death is homicide.

Quote:
Died as a result of asphyxia (lack of oxygen to the brain) due to strangulation as evidenced by the recently fractured hyoid bone in the neck and soft tissue hemorrhage extending downward to the level of the right thyroid cartilage. Autopsy reveleaved bone fracture, rib fractures, contusions in mid abdomen, back and buttocks extending to the left flank, abrasions, lateral buttocks. Contusions, back of legs and knees; abrasions on knees, left fingers and encircling to left wrist. Lacerations and superficial cuts, right 4th and 5th fingers. Also, blunt force injuries, predominatnly recent contusions (bruises) on the torso and lower extremities. Abrasions on left wrist are consistent with use of restraints. No evidence of defense injuries or natural disease. Manner of death is homicide. DOD 003329 refers to this case as "strangulation, found outside isolation unit."

Quote:
Death caused by the multiple blunt force injuries of the lower torso and legs complicated by rhabdommyolisis (release of toxic byproducs into the system due to destruction of muscle). Manner of death is homicide. Decedent was not under the pharmacologic effect of drugs or alcohol at the time of death.

Quote:
Cause of death: Closed head injury with a cortical brain contusion and subdural hematoma. Manner of Death: Homicide. Iraqi male civilian detainee died in US custody 12 hours after a reported escape attempt. Physical force was required to subdue the detainee, and during the restraining process, his forehead hit the ground. Closed head injury: subarachnoid hemorrhage over brain, cortical brain contusion, right subdural hematoma. Additional injuries: fractured rib, multiple contusions and abrasions to head, torso and extremities. Abrasions on wrists and ankles consistent with restraint. Hemorrhage of right muscle of neck. No evidence of natural disease. DOD 003329 refers to this case as "1 closed head injury - died 12 hours after escape attempt."

Quote:
"Enemy Prisoner of War" in US custody. Prisoner died of heat stroke. The clinical presentation of an axillary temperature of 102 degrees, dehydration, hypoxia and obtundation, along with non-specific autopsy findings and lack of significant natural disease or trauma are supportive of heat stroke. Temperatures in the area were reported to be greater than 110 degrees. No significant internal or external trauma was noted.

Quote:
Iraqi National male was captured by Navy Seal Team #7 and resisted aprehension. External injuries including multiple contusions are consistent with injuries sustained during apprehension. Fractures of the ribs and a contusion of the left lung imply significant blunt force injuries of the thorax and likely resulted in impaired respiration. Ligature marks of the wrists and ankles. Remote gunshot would of torso. No significant natural diseases identified. According to investigating agents, during interrogation of the detainee, a hood made of synthetic material was placed over the head and neck of the detainee. He died while detained at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. Cause of death: Blunt force injuries complicated by compromised respiration. Manner of Death: Homicide. DOD 003329 refers to this case as "1 blunt force trauma and choking; died during interrogation." DOD 003325 refers to this case with the notation "Q[uestioned] by OGA [Other Governmental Agency - non-military, often refers to the CIA] and NSWT [Navy Seals] died during interrogation."

_________________
Yes, I LOVE to talk while I fight! What shall we talk about? Wounds? Scars? Hot, dirty monkey love?
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:11 pm Reply with quote
Yaish
Intel Chief
 
Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 6218
Karma: +31




None of those COD's show torture. They show injuries, but how were those injuries obtained?

Is capturing an enemy combatant torture if you have to use force? Is subduing a prisoner who attacks guards torture? Sorry, doesn't cut it.

I don't buy the U.N.'s definition of torture either. Under that definition everyone is guilty of torture since it's so broad that spanking a child's butt or putting them in timeout would even qualify.

We could try it differently though, we could just ask real nice if the guy with the gun will tell us where the other guys with the guns are. If he tells us, maybe we can ask real nice that they don't shoot us. I wouldn't want to use any force that might cause them pain, injury, or even mental distress.

As for your nephew trying to kill 'them', do you really think so? Does your nephew go looking for Iraqi's driving down the street and deliberately plant bombs next to their cars? Does he go into police stations or government offices and kill people he never met?
If he did happen to have an enemy combatant in front of him, who gave up his gun and surrendered would your nephew still shoot him anyway?
Acts of war and acts of terrorism are a little bit different.

_________________
... the kilt had concealed a blaster strapped to one thigh and a knife to the other. He was aware of the present gentle customs against personal weapons, but he felt naked without them. Such customs were nonsense anyhow, foolishment from old women - there was no such thing as "dangerous weapons," only dangerous people.
--Robert Heinlein in Methuselah's Children
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:27 pm Reply with quote
enigma
Deputy Dawg
 
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 2380
Karma: +36
Location: Somewhere in Tennessee




Those autposy exerpts prove zilch... those are injuries.Could have been caused by having to be restrained following an attack on soldiers or guards, or they could have had some of those injuries before they were ever taken into custody... hell, one of them died due to complications from coronary artery disease... how is that torture?

Wanna hear about the injuries my brother sustained when the fuckers blew him up? How about the injuries my father suffered when they flew a plane into the building he was in? The latter would be tougher to tell you about though... since his remains have never been recovered.

These are terrorists we are dealing with... not a noble fighting force defending their country. These are animals who think the 'infidel' (us) should be exterminated.

_________________
Sworn to Serve and Protect your ass... Not to kiss your ass.
View user's profile Send private message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:31 pm Reply with quote
Raven
Google Meister
 
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 2742
Karma: -18
Location: Detroit, MI, USA, North America, Earth, Sol, Orian's Arm, Milkyway, Uni Alpha-Prime




I'm confused about you two... is your argument to disprove torture, or support torture? because both of your posts start with disproving, then end with supporting... why would you worry about supporting it if you already disproved it?

_________________
"The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion that stands at the cradle of true art and true science. Whoever does not know it and can no longer wonder, no longer marvel, is as good as dead, and his eyes are dimmed."
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:58 pm Reply with quote
asmodee
 
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 858
Karma: +16




Quote:
As for the bad guy? He's trying to kill your nephew.


Me saying that my nephew was trying to kill him was a response to that part. It's war. Of course they're trying to kill each other. How they go about it makes no real difference to the context.

Quote:
None of those COD's show torture. They show injuries, but how were those injuries obtained?


Good point. The guy found restrained and dead in his cell of blunt force trauma could have slipped on a bar of soap. The guys doing the autopsies who ruled them "homicides", including the dead guy found restrained in his cell, were probably only qualified for the job because they'd seen every episode of CSI.

Quote:
I don't buy the U.N.'s definition of torture either.


Okay, now I want proof. Prove to me that you're more qualified to define what is and what is not torture than the UN committee assigned to define just that. It's easy to say that I'm wrong when you get to define what torture is; even easier when all you define is what it is not.

Look, we have a difference of opinion here. I have come to the conclusion that we have engaged in acts of torture, including sleep deprivation for weeks at a time, which I consider to be torture. You have come to the conclusion that we have not engaged in acts of torture and that depriving someone of one of the basic necessities of life is not torture. I can show you what I consider to be proof all day long and you will find nothing in it all day long. To me, autopsies showing that prisoners died of blunt force trauma while in a prison cell AND restrained is pretty damned definitive.

I always come into these things perfectly willing to lose an argument and be proven wrong. I always say that if you win an argument you don't learn anything. Read over what's been posted, though, and replace anything to do with "troops" and "torture" with "government" and "UFO" and see how your arguments read to you then.

I don't even know why this subject is so emotional. You don't have to hate America to admit that our government routinely does reprehensible things, ESPECIALLY to our troops, if you remember the affects of Agent Orange and they mysterious illnesses after Desert Storm. It is, in fact, a love for our country that DEMANDS that we hold a corrupt government accountable. It is very ignorant indeed to believe that every single man and woman fighting for this country is an upstanding, perfect citizen who would never do anything wrong, such as rape, torture, theft or murder. In fact, I can think of one incident right now where soldiers murdered a man in front of a UAV by monitoring its position and setting up the scene when it wasn't looking at them so that it would look justified when it was looking at them. There are bad apples in every barrel. I don't have to respect the rejects to love my country or its troops.

_________________
Yes, I LOVE to talk while I fight! What shall we talk about? Wounds? Scars? Hot, dirty monkey love?
View user's profile Send private message
Mexican Official Nabbing White House BlackBerries
Skeptomania - Paranormal / UFOs, etc. Forum Index -> CRIME, LAW, & THE COURTS
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 1 of 3  
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
  
  
 Post new topic  Reply to topic  


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2003 phpBB Group


Free Forum Free Top Site List
Make this Forum Ad-Free




1134355